[Current & Culture]What Was Overshadowed by Jeong Myeong-seok

The Netflix series I Am a God has been out for a month now. It has garnered a strong response through a clever strategy that evenly combines the strengths of TV investigative programs and theatrical documentary films while compensating for their weaknesses. We were also able to witness a new horizon opening when a broadcasting station’s professional staff and an OTT platform collaborate. Thanks to this, it seems such attempts will continue in the future. While applauding this commendable effort, today’s column will share a perspective somewhat different from the overwhelmingly positive reviews that have poured in so far.

First, it is regrettable that there has been little discourse focusing on the meaning of the subtitle. The subtitle attached to this series titled I Am a God is The People Betrayed by God. At first glance, it might seem more appropriate to say The People Who Betrayed God. After all, Jeong Myeong-seok, Park Soon-ja, Kim Gi-soon, and Lee Jae-rok all deified themselves and exploited God. But why is the subtitle not about those who betrayed God, but rather those whom God betrayed? It appears to emphasize that the protagonists of this series are not the corrupt religious figures but the people who worshipped them as gods and were betrayed?victims who suffered bodily violation, financial exploitation, and even loss of life. It also seems to be a gesture of gratitude to those who, even belatedly, found the courage to stand in front of the camera. Understanding this point makes the production intent clearer.

The shocking and bizarre acts of Jeong Myeong-seok have drawn such loud calls for his condemnation that other themes have been overshadowed, which is unfortunate. While it is important to properly punish him for the worst sexual crimes he committed, it is equally important to consider society’s response to cults. Religious freedom is guaranteed by the constitution, but excesses and illegal acts beyond the scope of freedom must not be overlooked under the guise of religion. This, I believe, is the overarching theme of the entire series. How far does the law permit religious freedom? The answer to that question will determine our society’s stance on cults. Currently, even the definition and scope of cults have not been publicly debated. If one of I Am a God’s achievements is to have awakened even some who were trapped in cults, then it is time for society to step up. Nevertheless, we know why politicians still tread carefully around numerous religious organizations despite all these justifications. Dear politicians, can you not summon even half the courage of the victims who overcame fear and shame to reveal their names and faces and speak out?

Documentaries are also records of history. Seeing past footage of famous people is another appeal of this series. We can see the youthful appearance of announcer Son Seok-hee just past thirty, and the press briefing by chief prosecutor Park Young-soo who handled the Odaeyang case. Did they expect to see themselves like this? Also, the distinctly different directing styles depending on the cases covered are intriguing. I found the episode dealing with the Odaeyang case the most entertaining genre-wise. For those who decide to watch this series belatedly after reading this article, I hope you don’t miss the enjoyable aspects despite the heavy subject matter.

Projects where broadcasting station production teams and OTT platforms join forces are continuing one after another. While cheering on the challenges of fellow producers, as a viewer, there is one series I really want to see. A documentary that thoroughly investigates the reality of domestic drug issues and raises awareness is urgently needed. There should already be more than enough archival footage.

Lee Jae-ik, Novelist